Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · TORBAYTorbay

A new route.Know the details.

Hypothetical example: a retired Torbay couple, one a former provincial public servant and the other a former teacher, are considering the Gold Card as a way to live in the United States near an adult child. They first need to decide which spouse will be the principal applicant and which will join as a derivative. The official framework, as published on the government's page and read September 7, 2026, describes a nonrefundable processing fee, an I-140G submission and vetting, and then a gift to the United States made on instruction. Executive Order 14351 directs the agencies to treat the gift as evidence of relevant EB-1 or EB-2 eligibility; each joining spouse or unmarried child under 21 adds a further fee and gift under the current terms. The Gold Card is not a conventional visa category, and every term must be re-verified on the official page before anything is paid. A sound first review produces a category assessment and a payment decision in that order. It identifies the proposed principal, the documentary basis for EB-1 or EB-2, every family member who would be processed separately, and the source of funds for any payment. Under the stated framework, the payment is made by the applicant to the U.S. government; it is not an equity contribution, and the Gold Card is never a conventional visa. No amount changes the underlying immigrant-category, admissibility or visa-availability analysis.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

IN THIS GUIDE · Decide who in the household is the principal and who is joining before reading the price

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

Two applicants or one principal and a joining spouse

Hypothetical example: the Torbay couple assume they will apply jointly for a single card. The official terms as read September 7, 2026 describe a principal applicant and, separately, joining family members, each of whom carries their own US$15,000 processing fee and US$1,000,000 gift. There is therefore no single household price, and the couple's first decision is which of them will be the principal applicant. The principal is the beneficiary of the I-140G and qualifying gift; the other spouse may apply as a derivative, subject to the separate fee, gift, vetting and admissibility requirements. The choice should be reviewed against the current official terms, the couple's family structure and tax circumstances, not against an invented requirement that one spouse first prove an ordinary EB-1 or EB-2 career profile. A household should model the principal-and-derivative choice before adding costs. The category evidence belongs to the principal, while the joining person's admissibility and separate payment obligations remain individually important. An adult child is not converted into a derivative by a family decision or a payment.

02

The underlying category is not optional

The framework results in classification through EB-1 or EB-2, but it does not instruct applicants to prove the ordinary career profiles independently of the Gold Card process. Executive Order 14351 directs the agencies to treat the qualifying gift as evidence of eligibility under EB-1 extraordinary ability or EB-2 exceptional business ability and national benefit, including a national-interest waiver. The current official FAQ requires eligibility for lawful permanent residence, admissibility and an available visa. The couple should follow the I-140G instructions and obtain case-specific advice about how the agencies will classify the principal, but should not be told that a retired public servant or teacher must establish a conventional pre-gift EB-1 or EB-2 record before applying. Ask for an evidence list that matches the precise EB-1 or EB-2 theory, then test it against the official criteria. Academic degrees, senior titles and long careers may be relevant but are not interchangeable with the required category proof. A negative assessment is useful before any nonrefundable step is taken.

03

Sequence of payment, and what the money is

The official page describes the US$15,000 processing fee as paid first and nonrefundable, followed by vetting, and then the gift, US$1,000,000 for an individual and US$2,000,000 for a corporate sponsor, made on official instruction. The gift is a gift to the United States. It is not an investment, is not returned, earns nothing and buys no interest in anything; it must never be compared with EB-5 capital, which is placed at risk in an enterprise and may be returned. Corporate sponsorship, not relevant to this couple, carries further annual and transfer charges. Keep the payment record distinct from an investment file. The applicant should retain the official instruction, payment confirmation and source-of-funds records, but should not expect ownership, income, repayment or an enterprise role in return. A corporate sponsor is not a substitute for the individual's eligibility where the framework requires an individual principal.

04

Admissibility, availability and current status

Both spouses must be admissible and an immigrant visa number must be available in the relevant category under the Visa Bulletin. Payment of the fee changes nothing about the couple's present status: they remain visitors on their trips to see their child until an immigrant visa is issued and used. Estimates of timing are not commitments, and the couple should not sell their Torbay home on the strength of one. The household's immediate status does not change while the process is pending. A visit remains subject to visitor rules, and travel or housing commitments should be treated as reversible until an immigrant visa is issued and used. Recheck the official terms immediately before payment because an online framework can change.

GOLD CARD · TORBAY

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.