Yes, if the investment has actually been made in establishing the company, the amount is substantial relative to its start-up cost, the plan credibly shows it will employ others or earn well beyond a living, and the contractor owns and directs it.
A start-up qualifies on committed spending and a credible plan, not on revenue
E-2 regulations contemplate an enterprise that is real and operating, or about to be, and a Torbay contractor who has leased premises, bought vans and equipment, obtained licences and insurance and hired a first technician has an enterprise in that sense even before the first invoice. The evidence of a real business is the spending and the contracts, and the officer will ask to see them. Substantiality is judged against the total cost of establishing the company, so the business plan must set that cost out honestly and the investment must cover it.
Marginality is where start-ups fail: a plan that shows one van and the contractor doing all the work indefinitely describes a job, not an enterprise. A plan with a second technician in year one, an office administrator in year two and a third van in year three, with wages that add up, describes an enterprise. The contractor must be a Canadian national, hold at least half the ownership and direct the company.